THE PLUNGER BUTTON

The plunger button is a fine tuning device enabling control of how much rotation the arrow has in the horizontal plane when leaving the bow. The aim is to have the 'perfectly shot' arrow leaving the bow with zero horizontal rotation. Rotation is generated by the action of the string force on the arrow where a torque is generated if the string force does not run through the arrow centre of mass.

Basic Torque Concepts

In the diagram the string force initially runs through the arrow centre of mass - no torque and no rotation. In the middle drawing the arrow has been rotated clockwise. This moves the centre of mass to the right and there is now a torque generating a clockwise rotation. In the right hand drawing the arrow has bent to the right moving the centre of mass to the right and there is now a torque generating a clockwise rotation. The bigger the perpendicular distance between the centre of mass and the line of the string force then the larger the resulting torque. While the arrow is being accelerated by the string it is continuously rotating and bending. As a consequence the arrow centre of mass is continually changing position moving towards and away from the bow. At the same time, during the shot, the direction of the string force is continually changing because of the archers paradox effect and the nock moving forward. The magnitude of the string force is continually changing as the nock moves forward.


Basic Spring Concepts

The more you compress a spring then the higher the force the spring exerts. The relationship between the force exerted by the spring and the amount of spring depression is given by:

Force = constant x depression + preset

The spring 'constant' is how much the force exerted by the spring increases as you depress it. If you look in your button package the spindly looking spring has a low spring constant and the one that looks as though you could use it in a pogo stick has a high spring constant. The 'preset' is how much initial compression there is in the spring (the starting force). As you 'tighten' the spring you increase the preset on the string. The above graph illustrates how two springs behave (one spring has two different presets hence the three lines). Lets suppose the aim is to compress the string to reach a specific spring force - the green line. The blue and red lines are the same spring (same spring constant hence the slope of the two lines are the same). The blue spring has a higher preset then the red spring so the button (spring) depression required to reach the green line for the blue spring is lower than for the red spring. The blue spring starts off with a higher spring force and over the same distance of travel the force from the blue spring is always higher than from the red spring. The action of an arrow 'bouncing' off a plunger button is a  dynamic situation i.e. it is time dependant. The time taken for the plunger button to reach the green line will probably be shorter for the blue spring than for the red spring so the effect on the arrow will be different for the blue and red springs. The purple line represents a diferent spring with different spring constant (line slope) and different preset.


Plunger Button Operation

There are two forces on the plunger button. The arrow shaft exerts a force Fa towards the bow and the spring exerts a force Fs away from the bow. The overall force on the plunger is Fa-Fs and this net force equals the effective mass (plunger + spring + friction) multiplied by the acceleration of the plunger towards the bow. The higher the spring force then the lower the plunger acceleration and so the less it depresses in a given time.

In the following discussion a right handed archer is assumed and direction of rotation is as seen looking down on the archer.

Over the whole shot one of the effects of the overall torque history on the arrow is to have the arrow leaving the string with some angular momentum (rotation) in the horizontal plane (fishtailing). This rotation can be in a clockwise or anti-clockwise direction depending on the torque 'history' during the shot. If the arrow leaves the string with clockwise rotation then drag will accelerate the arrow to the right. If the arrow leaves the string with anti-clockwise rotation then drag will accelerate the arrow to the left.

What we want to achieve is that when the arrow leaves the string it has zero angular momentum (rotation) in the horizontal plane (ignoring bow elevation). In this case the arrow will fly straight towards the target. The plunger button allows the archer some control over the rotation the arrow has leaving the bow because with it you have some control over the sideways movement of the arrow centre of mass and hence some control over the torque input to the arrow.

There are two main adjustments you can set with a pressure button, the initial position of the button (screw it in or out) and the spring characteristics (initial spring force and how the spring force varies as the button is depressed). What complicates the tuning process is that these two adjustments are not independant of each other in terms of what the arrow ends up doing.

At full draw prior to release the string force normally runs on the bow side of the arrow centre of mass (the arrow is is normally set up with the pile rotated anti-clockwise away from the bow).

The diagram illustrates the basic effect of the intial button position. As the button is screwed out the arrow centre of mass moves away from the line of the string force increasing the initial (anti-clockwise) torque setup. (The torque lever is the perpendicular distance from the centre of mass to the line of the string force). There are recommendations from arrow manufacturers and general archers 'lore' on about where this initial button position should be.(ref)

With the finger release the nock is accelerated away from the bow so the arrow is rotated clockwise.This moves the arrow alignment towards the plane of the bow and puts a bend in the arrow sufficient for the string force when it comes onto the end of the arrow to produce a clockwise orientated torque on the arrow and buckle the arrow in the sense for the nock to move away from the bow. This clockwise torque and the buckling force is dependant on the intitial arrow orientation before release i.e. the initial button centreshot position.

The combined effect of the string torque and arrow buckling is to rotate the front part of the arrow shaft into the bow. The shaft accelerates the pressure button plunger into the bow. The force between the shaft and the plunger depends on the effective mass of the plunger (plunger weight, spring weight, spring force and friction) and the rate of plunger acceleration (determined by the string torque and amount of shaft buckling). The overall force between the arrow and plunger will depend on factors like the draw weight and the arrow length as well as the centreshot position. My guess is that for a typical male archer with the draw weight in the 40-50 pounds region the force between the shaft and the plunger will lie somewhere around 400 to 600 grams weight equivalent.

As the button is depressed the arrow as a whole rotates towards the bow. The combined effect of the button force on the shaft and the pile inertia act to bend the front section of the arrow in the sense that the shaft in front of the button moves away from the bow and the shaft behind the button moves towards the bow. Overall the more the button is depressed the more the arrow centre of mass moves towards the bow and hence the higher the string torque on the arrow generating clockwise rotation (producing a 'weaker' arrow).

When you adjust the pressure button spring you are making fine adjustments to the effective mass of the plunger. If you increase the spring strength you are effecively increasing the effective plunger mass. This increases the force between the shaft and button (the front of the shaft will bend more) but more importantly you reduce the amount the arrow rotates into the bow reducing the clockwise string torque and hence the clockwise rotation. The bending/rotation effects act against each other with respect to movement of the arrow centre of mass so spring force adjustment is a very sensitive control of how much horizontal rotation the arrow ends up with.

The weaker the arrow the more it will buckle at the rear end and the more clockwise string torque will be generated. The arrow rotation into the button will increase. To tune a weak arrow therefore you have to increase the button spring tension to keep the arrow centre of mass way from the bow and thereby reducing the amount of string torque on the arrow you get. For a stiff arrow you need to do the opposite, reduce the button spring force.

To summarise the centreshot position and the button spring provide control of the sideways movement of the arrow centre of mass in the initial part of the shot (while the arrow is in contact with the plunger button) and hence some control of the amount of overall angular momentum (rotation) the arrow ends up with when it leaves the string. The principle is straightforward. If you reduce the initial clockwise string torque with the pressure button you reduce the angular momentum in the clockwise direction the arrow has when it leaves the string and vice versa.

Suppose using whatever tuning method you like, it appears that the arrows are leaving the bow rotating clockwise (weak). It means that the initial clockwise torque is too high i.e. the arrow centre of mass is initally moving to much towards the bow - too much clockwise rotation. You need to increase the preset spring tension reducing the amount of button depression and keeping that centre of mass away from the bow reducing the clockwise torque. If the arrow acts stiff it means that the arrow is leaving the bow rotating in an anti-clockwise direction - not enough initial clockwise torque. The initial clockwise torque can be increased by reducing the spring preset tension, moving the arrow centre of mass towards the bow.

Note that for normal tuning the control of movement of the arrow centre of mass is done by controlling the arrow rotation. Movement of the centre of mass via the bending of the arrow by the plunger button is secondary. This is not always the case. Suppose your arrows are too weak (whippy). Up to a point you can increase the spring tension reducing button depression and keeping that centre of mass out there but the resulting increased button force on the shaft means its going to bend more and arrow bending moves the centre of mass towards the bow. Bad news! Ultimately the arrow bending effect on the position of the arrow centre of mass is going to outweigh the button depression effect. If and when this happens your tuning guide falls over. Say your bare shaft hits to the right of the fletched shaft. You increase the spring tension and try again. The bare shaft hits the same distance or even further to the right of the fletched shaft. All you are basically doing at this point with the button spring is increasing the amount of arrow bend 'weakening' the arrrow instead of 'stiffening' it.

You don't have the above problem with an arrow that is too stiff. Dropping the button spring tension to increase the clockwise spring torque doesn't have any significant effect on the bending of the arrow by the button. The 'tuning window' is wider for a stiff shaft then a weak one.

When you do a basic tune like the bareshaft method you end up with a plunger button setup where the average (perfect) arrow you shoot leaves the bow with no horizontal angular momentum. The button setup you have is not the only one that that meets the tuning requirement. There are an infinite number of centreshot/spring setups that will give you a bareshaft tune. For example your button came with a variety of springs. You can normally change the spring and repeat the basic tune just as well. You can go beyond a basic tune using a more advanced approach, 'tuning for groups', 'microtuning', whatever you want to call it.

Only a few of the shots we make are perfect, most are mediocre. Advanced tuning involves looking at many different button setups to try to find one that has the maximum damage limitation. I.e. with a given (mediocre) shot one button setup will have the arrow leaving the bow with less angular momentum than another button setup. Advanced tuning includes looking for the most forgiving button setup.

The archer with most to gain from finding a forgiving setup is the average archer, he does more mediocre shots than a top archer. Perversely it is usually the top archers who spend the time and effort in search of this holy grail.

Archers have long been aware that how much the pile of the arrow extends beyond the plunger button has some effect on how 'forgiving' the setup is. Various theories (some completely off the wall) relating to the arrow's nodal points have been put forward to explain this effect. The following is my suggestion as to why this effect occurs. My view on how/why nodal points come into it is also presented.

When an arrow is shot it bends with the pile moving away from the bow (RH archer)so that the shaft flexes and rotates towards the bow. The following diagram illustrates (bearing in mind that the arrow is moving forward) how the amount the shaft moves into the plunger button varies with where the plunger button is located with respect to the pile.(this results from the pile inertia as regards lateral movement)


PBP1 As can be seen the further the plunger button is initially located behind the pile then the more the shaft at the button moves towards the button i.e. the more the button is depressed.

The force exerted on the plunger button relates to the mass of the plunger multiplied by the acceleration of the plunger. The bigger the distance the arrow moves into the button the higher the plunger acceleration (the 'flex' time is the same along the shaft) and hence the higher the force on the plunger button.

If an arrow is shot poorly, say 'weak' then the shaft bends more and flexes more into the button. The plunger acceleration is higher and so the force on the plunger is higher than for a perfect shot. Conversely if a poor arrow is shot 'stiff' then there is less less arrow flex into the button, the plunger acceleration is lower and the resulting force on the plunger button is less than for a perfect shot. The button therefore provides a negative feedback mechanism compensating for the effects of poor shots in terms of how much sideways movement of the arrow centre of gravity there is.

The further back the button is from the pile then the larger the difference there will be between the shaft flex into the button between the perfect and the bad shot and hence the larger the plunger button force difference between the perfect and the bad shot. The further back the plunger is from the pile the more bad shots will be compensated for by the action of the plunger button.

There are practical limits to how large an initial gap you can have between the arrow pile and the plunger button. As the plunger button has to be vertically above the grip pressure point to reduce the effects of bow torque moving the pressure button itself is not an option. The only mechanism available to increase the pile to button gap is by making the arrow longer so it projects more beyond the plunger.Making the arrow longer will reduce its stiffness, increase its mass and increase the shaft drag area. The main point is that the arrow needs to be matched to the bow for optimum grouping so there is a limit to how much longer the arrow can be. As usual its coming up with the best overall compromise between several different factors.

Nodal points do not form on an arrow until after the arrow has left the bow so there is no direct link between their positions and the action of the plunger button. The free vibrational properties of the arrow and hence position of the front node (whichever one you pick - see finding the nodes) is determined by the stiffness of the shaft material, the shaft length, shaft weight and the pile/nock/fletching weights. These are the same arrow properties which determine how well the arrow is matched to the bow. (This is why arrow selection programs can be based on a simple vibrational model of the arrow). What someone noticed (a guy developing an arrow matching program for Easton) was that if the front node was kept behind the pressure button position at full draw, you would keep an acceptable arrow match. This provides a guideline to how much the arrow pile can be extended in front of the plunger button. For example if the pile weight was increased the arrow would act weaker and so the maximum arrow length for an acceptable match would be reduced. Increasing the pile weight would move the front node forward indicating that less arrow 'overhang' was permissible.

Last Revision 1 July 2009